Kokesh to Pay $5million in SEC Case on Remand from Supreme Court

Charles Kokesh, who won a
unanimous U.S. Supreme
Court ruling in June over
whether there was a five-
year statute of limitations in
connection with his
allegedly illegal activities, must still disgorge $5 million, a federal
appeals court said on Monday.

However, that sum is significantly less than the $34.9 million Mr.
Kokesh was originally told to pay.
The case of Securities and Exchange Commission v. Charles
Kokesh has a long litigation history.

The SEC had charged Mr.
Kokesh with misappropriating funds from four business
development companies in violation of federal securities laws
from 1995 through 2006.

READ:   Leadway Insurance Resolves to Drive Insurance Growth

Following a jury trial, in 2014 the U.S. District Court in Las Cruces,
New Mexico, ordered the disgorgement of $34.9 million plus
prejudgment interest of $18.1 million and imposed a $2.4 million
civil penalty.

In August 2016, the 10th U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver
held the SEC was not subject to a five-year statute of limitations,
and Mr. Kokesh appealed.

However, after a contradictory opinion was issued by another
appeals court, the U.S. Supreme Court said in a unanimous 9-0
ruling in June 2017 in Mr. Kokesh’s case that the SEC’s
disgorgement recovery method is subject to a five-year statute
of limitations.

READ:   Don't Cross This Line When Recruiting Turns Into Poaching

Monday’s ruling by the 10h Circuit focused on the issue of
whether, in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling, Mr. Kokesh is
obligated to pay $5 million in connection with activities that
occurred with the five -year limitation period.

The statute-of-limitations issue in this case “turns on whether
defendant’s misappropriation of funds … are properly viewed as
a continuing violation or as a number of discrete wrongs,” said
the ruling.

In ruling for the latter, the decision said: “To hold that Defendant’s
misappropriations constituted only one continuing violation
would do much more than provide repose for ancient misdeeds;
it would confer immunity for ongoing misconduct …

READ:   Delay In Filing Insurance Claim No Reason To Reject It, Says Supreme Court

“We cannot continence such a result, nor do we think that a
proper interpretation of (the Supreme Court opinion) requires use
to,” said the ruling, in remanding the case with instructions to
require Mr. Kokesh to disgorge more than $5 million.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *